Texas A&M-CC
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,347  Regina Salinas JR 21:55
2,083  Taylor Hawes FR 22:39
2,147  Vanessa Galindo SR 22:43
2,161  carrisa pinon FR 22:44
2,328  Liz Romo FR 22:55
2,634  Shelby Polasek JR 23:19
2,684  Jasmine Boutte SR 23:24
2,692  Molly Tucker FR 23:25
3,105  Alex Rossi SR 24:09
3,133  Samantha Hardin JR 24:13
3,325  Brandie Garcia SO 24:45
National Rank #247 of 341
South Central Region Rank #21 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 13.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Regina Salinas Taylor Hawes Vanessa Galindo carrisa pinon Liz Romo Shelby Polasek Jasmine Boutte Molly Tucker Alex Rossi Samantha Hardin Brandie Garcia
Islander Splash 09/26 1269 21:44 21:59 22:26 22:49 22:57 22:42 23:24 24:20 24:07 24:44
Incarnate Word Invitational 10/11 1287 21:56 22:31 24:38 22:43 22:30 24:11 23:11 23:53 23:33
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1280 22:27 22:35 22:01 22:52 22:44 23:45
Southland Conference Championships 11/03 1318 22:01 22:34 23:02 23:32 22:58 24:36 23:21 25:00
South Central Region Championships 11/14 1338 21:57 23:25 22:42 23:06 23:24 23:55





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.6 596 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.9 3.0 9.5 28.6 37.1 15.5 4.8 0.2 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Regina Salinas 85.7
Taylor Hawes 122.2
Vanessa Galindo 125.2
carrisa pinon 126.1
Liz Romo 135.3
Shelby Polasek 154.2
Jasmine Boutte 157.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 0.9% 0.9 18
19 3.0% 3.0 19
20 9.5% 9.5 20
21 28.6% 28.6 21
22 37.1% 37.1 22
23 15.5% 15.5 23
24 4.8% 4.8 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0